Improve your old prints - Scan those old negatives

For those wondering if its worthwhile scanning your old colour negatives, think no more, do it! If you had your film commercially printed you are likely to be shocked and very pleased by the results.......

For the past 2 years I've been working on a project to digitise all of my family photographs. Up until now this involved scanning all of my Fathers old 620 B&W negatives - and I've been very surprised by just how much I've been able to improve the quality by following a simple photoshop workflow (which I'll detail later). However this week I started scanning my own 35mm colour negatives, and I've been shocked and angry with the results.....

I still have the old commercially processed prints and based on those I've always had a pretty low opinion of my technical ability with a camera. Over 90% of my prints appear to be grossly under or over exposed, or with a strong colour caste.

Here are some examples. Study and compare the scanned prints against the scanned negatives and you'll see why I was both pleasantly surprised and angry.




The original photograph (Ayesgarth Falls in the Yorkshire Dales)







Compare with the scanned negative












Here again we have another example: this time an apparently underexposed photograph taken in natural light (without flash). But again take a look at the negative - not too bad at all.

Note: all I've done with both these negatives is use the noise filter and tweak the shadow/highlights/midtones.


The cheap commercial processors have clearly misrepresented the image on the negative. Obviously, had I paid a bit more I could have got much better results. But like millions of others I overestimated the technology used and blamed myself when the prints didn't quite turn out as hoped.


Thanks to those poor quality prints I virtually abandoned colour film for slides and B&W. The latter I used to process myself. (After dabbling with colour printing I concluded that it was too hit and miss, and hence too expensive to pursue). Finally when the children had grown up I virtually gave up on photography until the first digital cameras came along, and finally I started to get better results - consistently.

So if you want to relive some memories and spice up your albums, dust off your old negatives and start scanning them into photoshop. I can almost guarantee that when you print the files, you'll get better results than those old commercially printed films.

The Workflow

I use an Epson Perfection V700 Photo Scanner and the included Epson Scan software to scan the negatives. See an excellent review at http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Epson%20V700/page_1.htm

I've found it unnecessary to use any of the 'advanced' features of the scanning software, i.e. I used the Home Mode Colour Negative setup, with resolution set to 300dpi and paper size A3 (so I can subsequently use my Epson Stylus Photo R1800 Printer to print the files at any size up to A3). The files were saved in TIF format ready for adjustment/fine tuning in Photoshop.

All adjustment including noise/scratch/dust removal was done in Photoshop using the 'reduce noise' filter. I could have used the scanners Digital ICE software but found the result to be unpredictable and time consuming - far better to do it in Photoshop.

Apart from applying a noise filter the only other adjustment I've found necessary is Image>Adjustments>Shadow/Highlight where I have fine tuned the shadow/highlight detail or adjusted the mid tones.

That's all folks.

P.S. when I showed the results to my wife, Barbara, she explained that she once had a summer job in a print shop where as a 'skilled' operative she made subjective adjustments as she saw fit with little or no help from the technology - just as I had to do when I dabbled in colour processing. Very hit and miss. Arghhhhh!!!!






No comments:

Post a Comment

Copyright

© All rights reserved

Search This Blog